Health Care Expenditures: Show Me The Money!

Any substantive discussion of health care requires a solid foundation.  So here’s a primer on health care expenditures – where the money came from and where it went – prior to the ACA.

Who provides our insurance: in 2007, a little more than half of us (54%) had employer-provided health insurance. Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP covered another 26%, and 4% of people purchased their own insurance. Sixteen percent of us had no insurance.

Who provides insurance 2007

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation State Health Facts – 2007

But three years later, things had changed significantly.  Less than half of us got insurance from our employers.  Medicaid and Medicare coverage rose to 16% and 13%; private insurance covered 5%.   The percentage of uninsured remained the same.

Who provides insurance 2010

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation – State Health Facts

Government employees get their insurance with taxpayer dollars, not employer revenue.  The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) has 1.6 million members. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) together have 700,000 members. There are 1.8 million active duty service men and women, many with dependent families, receiving “government-run health care.”   Add veterans and their families covered by TRICARE and the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA) and we are much closer to “socialized medicine” than any politician will ever admit.

 Who pays for health care: Government is already the single largest health care purchaser; In Medicare, Medicaid, the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and other public funds paid 40% of health care costs in 2011.  And just to clear up any misconceptions, two thirds of Medicaid funds go for care of the elderly and disabled.  Yep, Medicaid pays for your grandmother’s nursing home, not Medicare, which only covers skilled nursing care.

Private insurance paid for 33% of expenditures; out-of-pocket spending and other private funds accounted for 11% and 7%, respectively.

Who paid for health care 2011

 

 

 

 

Source: California Health Care Foundation

Where our health care dollars go: Hospitals receive 31.4% of our health care dollars; doctors get 19.9% and drugs consume another 10.1%.  Nursing homes receive 5.5% and we spend 2.7% on home health care. “Other Personal Health Care Spending” includes goods and services such as dental, vision and durable medical equipment. “Other Health Spending” includes administrative costs, research, public health services, buildings and equipment.

KFF NHE 2010

Sources: Kaiser Family Foundation and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Who do we spend it on? The good news is half of us rarely need medical care, accounting for about 3 percent of all health care spending.  The bad news is 5 percent of us are responsible for almost half of expenditures.  The top 1% of people are “super-utilizers,” whose chronic, poorly managed illnesses account for 22% of our annual bill.

Population Consuming Health Care

Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

One would expect caring for the elderly to be more expensive, but the United States spends far more than other countries.

Health Care costs by age

I’ll try to explain WHY we spend so much money in my next post.

The World’s Most Expensive Health Care

The United States spends far more money on health care than any other country. In 2010 we spent $8,233 per person, about 2.5 times the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) average and half again as much as the next most generous country, Norway.   The total cost, $2.6 TRILLION dollars, was 17.6% of our GDP, one-and-a-half times more than those “socialist hellholes” Denmark, France, Canada, the Netherlands and almost double the U.K.

US vs World Health Care

Some people-notably the well-insured and conservative commentators-think this is just fine. “We have the best health care in the world, but government is trying to take that away from us and give it to lazy people.” There will be rationing, death panels, people dying in the streets and your wife will certainly die from breast cancer.

Others, like the people actually paying the bills (namely, Uncle Sam), realize spending all that money doesn’t get us much.  The United States is 51st in life expectancy; our outcomes are about the same as countries with single-payor systems; our pharmaceuticals and hospital procedures cost a lot more. We’ve also rationed health care for decades based on one’s ability to pay, but that’s a separate topic for another rant.

So, somewhere along the line government decided that we should cut our annual health care expenditures. American Medical News published an article I wrote back then warning health care reform wouldn’t be successful because reformers were asking “What kind of health care do you want?” rather than “How are you going to pay for it?”

Spending less money on health care means paying less, and/or doing less. That is simple mathematics. So who is will be the first to accept “less”?

  • Will patients accept less care than they want (as opposed to the care they need)?
  • Will hospitals accept less revenue?
  • Will physicians accept lower salaries?
  • Will insurance companies agree to lower premiums?
  • Will pharmaceutical companies accept less money for their already overpriced drugs?
  • Will manufacturers sell MRI machines and surgical robots for less?

Nothing is likely to happen without tradeoffs; everyone will have to give up something.

If I was contemplating a career in medicine instead of looking at retirement, I’d agree to a lower than expected salary in exchange for free medical school training, decent working conditions and getting the plaintiffs’ attorneys on a very short leash.

  • I wouldn’t need to make a hefty salary if I didn’t graduate with $250,000 in school debt.
  • I would provide much better service if I wasn’t on call every night or every other night.
  • I would be able to do what I thought was right rather than wasting a lot of money covering my ass.

But first we need a national dialog about our health care system.  What do people want?  More importantly, how do they propose paying it?

 

 

 

About those premium hikes…

ACA opponents have been screaming about health insurance premiums going up because of Obamacare.

I hate to rain on their parade, but premiums have been increasing every year since at least 1999.  Here are figures for the average annual cost of a family policy, courtesy of the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Year   Premium  % increase
1999 – $5791          —
2000 – $6438        11%
2001 – $7061          9%
2002 – $8003         13%
2003 – $9068         13%
2004 – $9950           9%
2005 – $10880         9%
2006 – $11480         5%
2007 – $12106         5%
2008 – $12680         4%
2009 – $13375         5%
2010 – $13770         2%
2011 – $15073        12%
2012 – $15745          4%
2013 – $16351          4%

Notice the giant 12% hike in 2011, before the ACA required insurers to come begging for rate increases above 10%.  Also remember the insurance companies had to hand out $1.1 billion in premium rebates because they were spending more money on administrative costs than the ACA permitted.

We get our insurance through the Joliet Diocese.  Peg gets it free; insuring me runs about $5000/year.  Every year, the cost has gone up while pharmaceutical coverage gets more restrictive.  We’re also forced to use a mail-order service for maintenance prescriptions; we got stuck paying $150 for a medication even though the manufacturer had a discount program that guaranteed it would cost $15/month.  The service refused to honor the discount program but also wouldn’t let us go to a pharmacy that would.

The only solution to this is a single-payor system, but there will be a lot of howling when it happens.  More on that in my next post.

About That Individual Mandate…

One of the most oft-heard arguments against the ACA’s individual mandate is “How can the government compel me to buy something I don’t want and don’t need?”

cry-baby-blog

Well, Skippy, government has been compelling you to do things for a long time.  The Feds make you pay income taxes or risk fines and jail time.  Most states compel you to wear seatbelts, because people who wear seat belts are less likely to die or be seriously injured in auto accidents.  If you don’t wear one and get caught, you get fined, even if YOU aren’t the driver.

If you have a house and a mortgage, the bank makes you buy homeowner’s insurance so they are not stuck with an empty lot if the house burns down and you default.  If you have a car, the state makes you buy auto insurance before you can get license tags and the bank will make you get insurance if you’ve financed the car.

“But what if I don’t own a house or a car?”  If you rent and don’t have renter’s insurance, you’re just a dumbass.  If you don’t have a car or a house, you don’t need auto or homeowner’s insurance, and you’re a dumbass for asking that question.

Here’s the reality.  People who get sick without health insurance don’t just disappear.  They eventually seek care, usually when they are a lot sicker.  The cost for that care was about $176 billion in 2013, and we’re all on the hook for about two-thirds of that.

You don’t think you should pay for someone else’s care because you are healthy? How do you think traditional insurance works in the first place?  Many people pay premiums for auto and homeowner’s insurance; those who get into an accident or suffer damage to their home get the benefit.  Most employees are healthy but the premiums the employees pay cover those unfortunate enough to become ill.  Otherwise, only sick people would buy insurance and the cost would be astronomical.

You own a body?  You need to insure it, so I don’t have to pay for YOUR health care when YOU get sick and don’t have insurance.  It’s only fair.

The Devil’s Tools

Social networking is a tool of the devil made for cowards and narcissists.

Now, don’t think I’m a total Luddite.  Social networking has become the great equalizer of the 21st century.  You Tube provides a virtually unlimited audience to the talented; it also attracts the terminally stupid who find infamy (but no fortune) in the parade of idiotic stunts.  More job-seekers find employment through Facebook connections than by shot-gunning e-mail résumés.  The Egyptian people used Twitter to communicate after the government shut down the Internet.

But social networking has its dark side.

GM did a commercial for the Chevy Cruze. Boy drops off girl in front of her apartment; they exchange a quick kiss.  He drives off in his Cruze and summons the Online Genie, asking for his Facebook update. The result (in a woman’s voice, naturally) is, “Best first date…ever.” What?  You couldn’t tell him that to his face?  And he didn’t have the balls to ask you, “So, whaddya think?”

My 19-year old nephew broke up with his girlfriend via text messaging. That is tacky but more distressing was – neither one of them saw anything wrong with this! Texting, Twittering, Facebooking and all the other “verbified” means of communication are creating a generation of morons deathly afraid of interpersonal relationships and rejection.  It reminds me a book in Isaac Asimov’s I, Robot series; people lived alone, tens or hundreds of miles apart, communicating only via what we call webcams, as actual physical contact had become culturally unacceptable.

Several people I knew in the past as actual flesh-and-blood humans have “friended” me but substituted Facebook posts, pokes, nudges, winks, whatever, for e-mail, but we still interact. It’s a great way to show your friends pictures of the human or canine grandchildren or your vacation halfway around the world, or to commiserate about how your adult children who haven’t matured are driving you to drink.  In other words, our relationship is still a dialog.

But Facebook Fanatics rave about the hundreds or thousands of “friends” they have; friends who wouldn’t know you from Mickey Mouse if they ran into you on the street.  Or, as Wiley Miller observed:

nq090630

Life is rough and relationships require constant work.  Sometimes one gets hurt, but sometimes one finds reward far greater than ever imagined.  I’ve been through both; what doesn’t kill you really makes you stronger. But a real friendship goes two ways.  That’s what friends are for.